A philosopher is a wise man distinguished for wisdom and sound judgement while a sage is a wise man distinguished for wisdom and from experience.
The philosophers
Philosophyis concerned with fundamental problems regarding existence, values, mind, language, etc., by a critical, systematic approach that relies on logical argument and reason. Academic philosophy, on the other hand, is distinguished from the activity philosophizing by a pre-set of technical terms and pre-existing concepts, curriculum, and methodologythat take years of study to internalize. […]
The philosophical approachto thinking ideally leads to system building. Besides, only the creators of the most memorable philosophical systems– Immanuel Kant, David Hume, Georg W. F. Hegel, Karl Marx, for example – are remembered as great philosophers. Yet, none of the great philosophers’ great philosophical systems– all purely intellectual inventions(we say: Vorstellungen or representations), no doubt – seemed to have passed the test of time.
New philosophical systemscome and go, and – as a rule – the most easily impressionable students who take any of them too serious and as a matter-of-fact run into the dangers of growing up as pungent and intolerant followers of another man’s intellectual fantasies.
The sages
In his essay ‘Thinkers and Philosophers’, the linguistic sageJi Xianlincompared philosophers to other great scholars, “thinkers”, and observed the following:
“Thinkers I have in mind are not like that. They may have their own views on the things I just mentioned. However, they would never engage in any system-building nor engage in its cumbersome analysis. […] Nor do they write obscure texts, and much less do they dream up a philosophical system. What they write down is moderate, peaceful, and non-pretending, and everyone understands their thought. After reading it, our eyes shine bright and blister, our minds are clear and free of confusion, and we realize: Yes, this is how things truly are.”
A sage can do philosophy, but not every philosopher is a sage. A sage practices sagehood, which is linked to self-cultivationand the striving for balance, harmoniousness, and human perfection. A sage’s thinking is concerned with the relationshipof himself with other human beings, and the relationship of human beings with the greater orderof all things. Here is a striking definition given by Robert C. Neville:
“Sagesunderstand memories and expectations, guilt and frustrations, joys and sorrows, suffering, pain, triumph, ecstasy, nobility, depravity, honor, degradation, sincerity, mendacity, stress and release. They understand the combinations and ambiguities of these in the lives of persons and in the affairs of peoples, and their understanding allow them so to follow the trail of what is important through the underbrush of trivialitythat they cleave to what is essential. Sages are those who understand people. What people? Anyone. […] Sages must live from long experience, not from intuitive encounters.”
Philosopher vs sages
“Judgment”, according to Immanuel Kant, the father of German rationality, issubjective universality. It means: “being indifferent to the existence of the object”. As a result of that indifference, the philosopher’s judgments will be (ideally) “free from interest and inclinations”. A philosopher does not need toconnectto anything or anyone, nor does he have to be a morally good person (as saints do) or prove himself a worthy member of the community (as sages do). Not the philosopher’s person or moral character is idolized; his merits rest solely on the noveltyand challenge of the argument he presented.
The ancient Greeks thought of a philosopher as aneternal seekerof wisdom: someone who always searches the truth, comes close to it, but ultimately cannot attain perfect wisdom. That was reserved for the gods. As opposed to a philosopher, the sage (or “sophos”) in ancient Greece was considered thebearerof wisdom: someone who already possessed wisdom and only needed to self-actualize himself.
Platowas proud to be a philosopher. He argued that a sage or “sophos” by definition was impartial to the joys of truth seeking, because a sophos claimed he already possessed that wisdom. […] Sages were light, and Plato could not take light. He preferred the law. Only the eternal condemnation to searching the truth was true love. Consequently, Greek philosophers developed an aversionto sages and their perceived hypocrisies, theirsagacity.
Subscribe for counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday
The triumph of the philosophers…
InThe Sophist(c. 360 BC) andThe Republic(c. 380 BC), Plato described the sophosas having a false sense of divine inspirationand suffering from a delusion about their own mythical status. Plato further ascribed to the sage a highly manipulative characterand an erroneous belief in human supernaturaland esotericpowers. From the philosopher’s point of view, the sages did not seek nor did they really care much about the truth; all the sages thought and cared about was, allegedly, their status, power, and influence. Like a false prophet who seeks an elevated place from where he could air his false views and propagate his erroneous teachings.
… marked the end for the sages
More than two thousand years have passed in Europe since Plato and thetriumph of the philosophersover the sages. Not even Jesus Christhimself dared to call himself a sage; he could not! Highest wisdomwas now with God. In theNew Testament, The Book of James3:17-18, we read: “Contrasting the false wisdom is true wisdom – Wisdom from God. God’s wisdom is pure, peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial, and sincere.” False wisdom, on the other hand, is that of the mere people, human wisdom. Finally, the Western Enlightenmentand all rational academies schooled sagacityout of the European minds, and made the sagesbecome obsolete and a relic of the past.
Image credit: Laurin Rinder/Shutterstock.com
This is a condensed version of a chapter on ‘Philosophers and Sages’ from the manuscriptShengren. In the next post, we shall have a look at ‘saints‘ – another great archetype of wisdom.
To keep up to date with this blog you can follow me onTwitter,RSS, myWebsite, or my otherBlog.
