Justice Department Sues Google for Monopolizing Digital Advertising Technologies (2024)

Today, the Justice Department, along with the Attorneys General of California, Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Virginia, filed a civil antitrust suit against Google for monopolizing multiple digital advertising technology products in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.

Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the complaint alleges that Google monopolizes key digital advertising technologies, collectively referred to as the “ad tech stack,” that website publishers depend on to sell ads and that advertisers rely on to buy ads and reach potential customers. Website publishers use ad tech tools to generate advertising revenue that supports the creation and maintenance of a vibrant open web, providing the public with unprecedented access to ideas, artistic expression, information, goods, and services. Through this monopolization lawsuit, the Justice Department and state Attorneys General seek to restore competition in these important markets and obtain equitable and monetary relief on behalf of the American public.

As alleged in the complaint, over the past 15 years, Google has engaged in a course of anticompetitive and exclusionary conduct that consisted of neutralizing or eliminating ad tech competitors through acquisitions; wielding its dominance across digital advertising markets to force more publishers and advertisers to use its products; and thwarting the ability to use competing products. In doing so, Google cemented its dominance in tools relied on by website publishers and online advertisers, as well as the digital advertising exchange that runs ad auctions.

“Today’s complaint alleges that Google has used anticompetitive, exclusionary, and unlawful conduct to eliminate or severely diminish any threat to its dominance over digital advertising technologies,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. “No matter the industry and no matter the company, the Justice Department will vigorously enforce our antitrust laws to protect consumers, safeguard competition, and ensure economic fairness and opportunity for all.”

“The complaint filed today alleges a pervasive and systemic pattern ofmisconduct through which Googlesought to consolidate market powerandstave offfree-market competition,”said Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco.“Inpursuit of outsized profits, Google has caused great harmtoonline publishers and advertisers and American consumers. Thislawsuit marks an important milestone in theDepartment’s efforts to hold big technology companies accountable for violations of the antitrust laws.”

“The Department’s landmark action against Google underscores our commitment to fighting the abuse of market power,” said Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta.“We allege that Google has captured publishers’ revenue for its own profits and punished publishers who sought out alternatives.Those actions have weakened the free and open internet and increased advertising costs for businesses and for the United States government, including for our military.”

“Today’s lawsuit seeks to hold Google to account for its longstanding monopolies in digital advertising technologies that content creators use to sell ads and advertisers use to buy ads on the open internet,” said Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division.“Our complaint sets forth detailed allegations explaining howGoogle engaged in 15 years of sustained conductthat had — and continues to have — the effect of driving out rivals, diminishing competition, inflating advertising costs, reducing revenues for news publishers and content creators, snuffing out innovation, and harming the exchange of information and ideas in the public sphere.”

Google now controls the digital tool that nearly every major website publisher uses to sell ads on their websites (publisher ad server); it controls the dominant advertiser tool that helps millions of large and small advertisers buy ad inventory (advertiser ad network); and it controls the largest advertising exchange (ad exchange), a technology that runs real-time auctions to match buyers and sellers of online advertising.

Justice Department Sues Google for Monopolizing Digital Advertising Technologies (1)

Google’s anticompetitive conduct has included:

  • Acquiring Competitors: Engaging in a pattern of acquisitions to obtain control over key digital advertising tools used by website publishers to sell advertising space;
  • Forcing Adoption of Google’s Tools: Locking in website publishers to its newly-acquired tools by restricting its unique, must-have advertiser demand to its ad exchange, and in turn, conditioning effective real-time access to its ad exchange on the use of its publisher ad server;
  • Distorting Auction Competition: Limiting real-time bidding on publisher inventory to its ad exchange, and impeding rival ad exchanges’ ability to compete on the same terms as Google’s ad exchange; and
  • Auction Manipulation: Manipulating auction mechanics across several of its products to insulate Google from competition, deprive rivals of scale, and halt the rise of rival technologies.

As a result of its illegal monopoly, and by its own estimates, Google pockets on average more than 30% of the advertising dollars that flow through its digital advertising technology products; for some transactions and for certain publishers and advertisers, it takes far more. Google’s anticompetitive conduct has suppressed alternative technologies, hindering their adoption by publishers, advertisers, and rivals.

The Sherman Act embodies America’s enduring commitment to the competitive process and economic liberty. For over a century, the Department has enforced the antitrust laws against unlawful monopolists to unfetter markets and restore competition. To redress Google’s anticompetitive conduct, the Department seeks both equitable relief on behalf of the American public as well as treble damages for losses sustained by federal government agencies that overpaid for web display advertising. This enforcement action marks the first monopolization case in approximately half a century in which the Department has sought damages for a civil antitrust violation.

In 2020, the Justice Department filed a civil antitrust suit against Google for monopolizing search and search advertising, which are different markets from the digital advertising technology markets at issue in the lawsuit filed today. The Google search litigation is scheduled for trial in September 2023.

Google is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with a headquarters in Mountain View, California. Google’s global network business generated approximately $31.7 billion in revenues in 2021. Google is owned by Alphabet Inc., a publicly traded company incorporated and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and headquartered in Mountain View, California.

Justice Department Sues Google for Monopolizing Digital Advertising Technologies (2024)

FAQs

What is the DOJ suing Google for? ›

Google is on trial for allegedly using underhanded tactics to ensure it stays the world's leading search engine. The U.S. Justice Department claims Google, which owns a 90% market share in search, paid massive sums to companies like Apple to make it the default search engine on products like the iPhone.

Did the DOJ open a lawsuit against Google to break up their tech monopoly? ›

The DOJ's antitrust trial against Google over its search dominance begins : NPR. The DOJ's antitrust trial against Google over its search dominance begins The biggest antitrust trial in nearly 25 years kicks off on Tuesday as the Justice Department makes its case that Google is an illegal monopoly.

Is Google a monopoly in advertising? ›

Segment DV360 and Display network: Google's dominance in the digital ad market is indisputable. The DOJ could break up Google's monopoly by breaking out DV360 and the Display Ads network.

What was the result of the Google lawsuit? ›

Dec 28 (Reuters) - Alphabet's Google (GOOGL. O) , opens new tab has agreed to settle a lawsuit claiming it secretly tracked the internet use of millions of people who thought they were doing their browsing privately.

How much will people get from Google lawsuit? ›

The company will shell out $630 million to a fund that will go directly to more than 100 million consumers nationwide, according to details of a settlement that was made public late Monday. An additional $70 million will be paid into a fund for states to disburse to consumers for similar claims.

Am I eligible for the Google lawsuit? ›

If you bought an app on Google Play or made any in-app purchase between August 2016 and September 2023, you may be owed some money.

Why is Google becoming a monopoly? ›

Being the default search engine gives Google access to more data than its rivals, allowing it to improve its algorithms and results and making it even harder for competitors to attract users.

Who won the Google lawsuit? ›

In a landmark decision, Epic Games won its lawsuit against the search giant.

How is Google abusing its monopoly power? ›

The plaintiffs allege Google's multi-billion-dollar contracts with Apple, Samsung, and others to make its search engine the default option on web browsers and mobile phones “illegally helped” the search giant maintain a monopoly in that market.

What happens if Google loses the antitrust lawsuit? ›

If Judge Mehta sides with the Justice Department, the government could ask for a range of remedies, including offering consumers an easier way to decide which search engine they would like to use and calling for Google's search distribution platforms, such as the Chrome web browser or Android operating system, to be ...

Is Google an illegal monopoly? ›

Google's App Store Ruled an Illegal Monopoly, as a Jury Sides With Epic Games. A jury in San Francisco unanimously found that Google stifled competition for its app store.

What is the Google ad controversy? ›

The move follows continuing European concerns over Google's advertising practices. In 2021, for example, the French competition authority, CNIL, found that Google had abused its dominant position in ad tech by favoring its own tools over those of its competitors. It fined the company €220 million ($238 million).

Did Google pay back $700 million to US Play Store users? ›

Google has agreed to pay $700 million and allow more competition in its Play app store, according to the terms of an antitrust settlement with US states and consumers filed in federal court on Monday.

Why did Google lose the lawsuit? ›

Google lost an antitrust lawsuit over barriers to its Android app store, as a federal court jury has decided that the company's payments system was anticompetitive and damaged smartphone consumers and software developers.

Why are people suing Google? ›

The class action, which was filed by law firm Boies Schiller Flexner in 2020, claimed that Google had tracked users' activity even when they set the Google Chrome browser to "Incognito" mode and other browsers to "private mode".

What is the Google lawsuit about? ›

The Justice Department accused Google of rigging the search market through preferential deals with phone makers like Apple and Samsung. The company will return to court in May for closing arguments in what is likely to be the biggest legal test for a tech company since U.S. v. Microsoft more than two decades ago.

Why is Google being sued for antitrust? ›

Google's algorithms relating to ad placement may be similar in nature to Facebook's advertising practices, which resulted in parent company Meta facing a lawsuit for social media addiction. All of these anti-competitive market practices combined have led to multiple lawsuits against Google, the tech giant.

What unfair practices are Google being accused of? ›

WASHINGTON — Search engine giant Google endured accusations Tuesday in federal court in Washington, D.C., that it unfairly squeezed out competition through contracts that were similar to ultimatums.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Nathanial Hackett

Last Updated:

Views: 6691

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (72 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Nathanial Hackett

Birthday: 1997-10-09

Address: Apt. 935 264 Abshire Canyon, South Nerissachester, NM 01800

Phone: +9752624861224

Job: Forward Technology Assistant

Hobby: Listening to music, Shopping, Vacation, Baton twirling, Flower arranging, Blacksmithing, Do it yourself

Introduction: My name is Nathanial Hackett, I am a lovely, curious, smiling, lively, thoughtful, courageous, lively person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.